Thrust bearing
Many of our listers have probably read the threads on torque tube failures
and thrust bearing problems wrecking motors. I have contributed a few
thoughts on the subject and have been most concerned [alarmed] about some
of the conclusions I have formed.
As some of you may remember my drive shaft broke almost two years ago. I
have also complained of a resonant vibration at around 3000 rpm which I
have previously listed to seek opinions.
We posted a suggestion that it may be prudent to regularly check the
tension of the flex plate to ensure that the thrust bearing is not
overloaded. I took my S4 into the local dealers this afternoon and we
carried out this check. When the pinch bolt was released the flex plate
popped back by about 4 to 5mm! I shuddered when I saw this.
We also checked the crank end float which was approximately 0.5mm or on the
outer limit of the tolerance range. Two years ago we checked this and it
was half the amount. We are not entirely sure about the gauge that was used
so we are going to recheck this in a day or two with another dial gauge.
After the adjustment was made a trial run indicated that the vibration at
3000 rpm had been significantly attenuated albeit there was still a little
roughness. I will comment on this when I have done a bit more mileage.
What does all this mean?
First of all I am confident my drive shaft was replaced correctly two years
ago. So, one of two possibilities has occurred, either the drive shaft has
stretched or the splined central boss has moved forward. Whether or not
there is damage to my crank thrust bearing remains to be seen but without
doubt it has been under more load than it might otherwise have been and,
subject to further checks, may well be at the back end of its theoretical
service life.
Given the apparently unreasonable incidence of torque tube failures on S4
automatics and/or destruction of the main thrust bearing I am rapidly
coming to the personal conclusion that for some reason our cars may be
prone to some kind of design related failure. In Oman we have seen 4 torque
tube failures in a vehicle population of around 30 machines in the last two
years. Interestingly all of them were S4's or GTS's, none were earlier
models [of which we have plenty here] and they typically had around 50 to
60k miles on the clock. I note that the recent Rennlist failures also had
this type of mileage on them.
This begats the question why does it affect the automatics? Not sure on
this one but I have a theory that it may relate to the way in which the
gearbox is set up. The gearbox has a vacuum modulator. Set to one extreme
the change is soft but sloppy. On the other extreme it is quick but a
little thumpy. My gearbox has always been quick on shifting. Remember, even
though the auto box is a Mercedes Benz design, the valve body was modified
by Porsche to give a sportier performance. I am starting to wonder if
sharks with their box modulated [intentionally or unintentionally] on the
sporty side become more vulnerable to shaft failure because of the torque
impulses exceeding the fatigue life criteria the machine was designed for.
If this is the cause then it may be unfair to describe the failure as being
"design related".
The torque tube, besides transmitting the power, also acts as a
transmission shock absorber. The shaft continually winds up and under
constant load twists proportionately to the torque applied [a simple
application of Young's law]. Excessive shock loading [during gear changes
for instance] may well have an impact on the fatigue life of the material.
Hence, if the shaft is exposed to more torque than it can absorb with the
elastic limit of the material or if the torque cycles applied to it mean
that the fatigue life is significantly reduced, one can reasonably predict
that the torque tube will stretch and ultimately fail. As it stretches, it
thrusts in a forward direction and la voila- the thrust bearing saga.
If you are lucky, the torque tube goes pop and if not the whole engine goes
due to thrust bearing failure.
It only takes half an hour for the mechanic to carry out the check for the
tension on the flex plate and about an hour if you want to check the end
float on the crank while you are at it [recommended that you record this].
If you own an S4 or GTS automatic and you have not had this checked I
strongly recommend that you consider doing this immediately and ask for the
check to be built into your services. If there is a design weakness we
cannot prevent the torque tube failure but we can protect the thrust
bearing.
There are other reasons as to why the clamp may have moved on the splines.
Incorrect torque being the obvious one, maybe vibration, but this would not
explain the torque tube failures.
Boys [and gals] I think we may well have been shafted!
Regards
Fred R
Oman
1990 S4 auto- questionable end float!
========================================
Hi,
The autos are affected only because they are hard connected to the
driveshaft. Manuals have the clutch and pressure plate saving them from
this problem. Also it is true the autos shift under load which may impact
the driveshaft stress. But driveshafts are apt to fail as often on manuals,
just less cars are manuals, so it may be a numbers game.
The thrust bearing can shoulder a load up to some calculated value, the
surface area, construction of the bearing determines this, just as with
other bearings in the car. E.g Simplistic example - wheel bearings carry
4000/4 1000 lbs each. I am not a mech eng, but obviously increasing the
load on the bearing will shorten its life, but with minimal load, it should
easily last into high mileage.
I have posted a tech service bulletin about this issue in addition to the
information we posted earlier in the week at www.jageng.com
(select 928
etc.)
Paul
=======================
New bearing crankshaft axial play is .110 - .312 mm the wear limit is .40 mm
(note this is metric mm )
===
tom
89 s4 at 58k
did the driveshaft /flexplate thing with capt earl this past weekend
(thanks earl), and the flexplate was quite bowed. moved 0.130 inches
when
the collar bolt was released (quite scary, visions of a new motor)
thankfully, the play in the driveshaft was only 0.005 inches (within
tolerance) whew!